Skip to main content
Threatstealth
Login
// AI.RED.TEAMING

Attack your AI before attackers do

Structured adversarial testing of LLM applications, AI agents, and machine learning systems — uncovering vulnerabilities that automated scanners and conventional pen tests miss entirely.

Reviewed by Threatstealth Security Architects·Aligned to SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · NIST CSF · PCI DSS V 4.0.1
// DEFINITION

What is AI Red Teaming — Adversarial Testing for AI Systems?

AI red teaming is structured adversarial testing of artificial intelligence systems to identify security vulnerabilities, safety failures, and exploitable behaviours. Unlike traditional penetration testing, AI red teaming focuses on LLM-specific attack techniques: prompt injection, jailbreaks, model extraction, training data extraction, agent hijacking, and adversarial input attacks against ML models.

// THE.PROBLEM

Why AI systems fail differently than traditional software

  • LLMs exhibit emergent failure modes — new attack techniques appear continuously and cannot be fully anticipated at build time
  • Traditional penetration testing methodologies do not cover LLM-specific risks: jailbreaks, prompt injection, model extraction, or data poisoning
  • AI safety evaluations (internal testing) and AI security red teaming are different — safety testing finds harmful outputs, security red teaming finds exploitable vulnerabilities
  • AI systems can behave differently under adversarial pressure than under normal use — creating vulnerabilities invisible in standard QA testing
// HOW.IT.WORKS

A four-step operational model

1

Scope & Threat Modelling

Define the AI attack surface, identify adversary personas (external attackers, malicious insiders, competitor actors), and map out the threat scenarios most relevant to your deployment.

  • AI attack surface mapping
  • Adversary persona definition
  • Priority threat scenario selection
2

Automated Adversarial Testing

Run systematic adversarial test suites covering the OWASP LLM Top 10, known jailbreak techniques, and injection attack patterns against all in-scope AI endpoints.

  • OWASP LLM Top 10 testing
  • Jailbreak resistance evaluation
  • 100+ prompt injection scenarios
3

Manual Expert Testing

Human red teamers attempt novel attack chains, multi-turn manipulation, indirect injection via realistic data sources, and agent hijacking scenarios.

  • Novel attack chain development
  • Multi-turn adversarial conversation
  • Agent tool chain exploitation
4

Finding Synthesis

Risk-ranked findings with exploitability evidence, business impact assessment, and prioritised remediation roadmap.

  • Exploitability-ranked report
  • Business impact mapping
  • Remediation priority roadmap
OWASP LLM
Top 10 coverage
Manual + Auto
Dual red team approach
100+
Adversarial test scenarios
NIST AI RMF
Framework aligned
// WHY.IT.MATTERS

Outcomes for security teams

AI systems fail in ways developers cannot anticipate

Emergent LLM behaviours under adversarial pressure are not discoverable through code review or standard QA — red teaming is the only reliable method.

Regulations increasingly require adversarial AI evaluation

NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and emerging sector guidance explicitly recommend adversarial testing as part of responsible AI deployment.

The cost of a jailbroken production AI is high

A successfully exploited LLM in production can damage brand reputation, expose sensitive data, and trigger regulatory scrutiny simultaneously.

// FAQ

Direct answers

What is AI red teaming?+

AI red teaming is structured adversarial testing of AI systems — using attacker-perspective techniques to find vulnerabilities, safety failures, and exploitable behaviours in LLMs and AI applications.

How is AI red teaming different from AI safety testing?+

AI safety testing evaluates harmful, biased, or policy-violating outputs. AI security red teaming evaluates exploitable vulnerabilities — prompt injection, data exfiltration, model extraction, and agent compromise — from an attacker perspective.

How is AI red teaming different from traditional penetration testing?+

Traditional pen testing focuses on CVEs, misconfiguration, and access control vulnerabilities in web and network infrastructure. AI red teaming specifically targets LLM-layer risks that require different techniques and specialised expertise.

Does Threatstealth offer automated AI red teaming?+

Yes — automated adversarial test suites run continuous regression testing against your AI endpoints. Manual expert red teaming is available for deeper, novel attack chain development.

Closed · Expert Access

Ready to see it in your environment?

Request a private security demo from the Threatstealth team.